It's official! 99% of digital agencies don't have a clue about the social web

Media_http4bpblogspot_bcqlz
It must also be said that 65.6% (that's nearly two thirds) of statistics are made up on the spot. However, when it comes to businesses (even the very large brands) looking for help and guidance on how best they should integrate social media into their customer contact/engagement strategy; they typically turn to their existing agencies. Which is the most natural thing to do.

Such agencies then feel they should be in an authoritative position on the subject. They don't wish to lose any credibility by actually admitting this isn't their core expertise, they'd feel exposed and a bit silly (honesty doesn't seem to matter) and of course they can hear the "kerching" of the extra revenue which may come their way.

So what happens is, agencies "play the game" and begin to regurgitate sound bytes from the numerous and various articles spread over the web (most of which have been plagiarised from a very limited source of genuine innovative thinking). Then, after a while, they start to believe their own bulls**t and believe they sound credible. Because of the perceived recency of social web (when actually it has been around for several years) the ability to sound convincing, especially to a client who is looking for advice and has limited knowledge, is fairly easy. We have seen this happen in meetings, at seminars and networking events many times and have felt the need to cut into the conversation to prevent bad decisions being made. Observing this and having conversations with some of the largest agencies who, in some of their more candid moments will actually admit "off the record" that they really don't have a clue. We could name names...but that may land us in some hot water...three letter acronyms...oops! This whole situation just isn't right.

It is appreciated that organisations, especially in the current economic climate, want to minimise risk and therefore turn to well established digital agencies who are financially stable and safe. However, some common sense should prevail when you understand the core skills and experience of these agencies. Typically they do a very good job at media buying and advertising; design work, may dabble in paid search, venture out into search engine optimisation (quality is debatable) and now have probably set up a new Social Media Department so as not to miss the bandwagon.

And then....they start talking about Social Media Marketing...selling your products via the social web. If that is the direction you have been steered down and your twitter updates are all about discounted products; your facebook fan page is talking about up and coming sales you should stop right now, as this won't work. In fact, it will tarnish your brand.

Think about your customers and what they want. Look at their motivation; understand their behaviour; work with them and help them. Give them advice, support, customer service, make them laugh, chat to them on a one to one...just try to avoid the constant sales pitch. You don't like it when it is aimed at you and they don't like it either.

So when your incumbent agency, who were originally selected by your organisation for something totally different, starts to come to you with "social media marketing" ideas, look at them long and hard, and ask some challenging questions, such as:-
  • Why would this appeal to my customers?
  • Who would it appeal to?
  • What exactly is the objective here?
  • How does this integrate into our overall customer contact strategy?
  • Is this in sync with our brand values, the things we stand for?
  • What are the performance measures?
  • How are we going to measure this?
  • Who makes this happen?
That should keep them busy. Points are deducted for pauses, repetition, stuttering and any farmyard aromas.

Pros and Cons of Contextual Paid Search Ads

Media_http3bpblogspot_icaeg
You may...may not be aware of the ability to place your Google Paid Search (PPC) ads contextually i.e. in places where there is a relationship between the website content where the ad will feature and the content of the ad itself. This service has come on leaps and bounds just recently and advertisers are now able to also select certain social networks where the ad can be considered for placement, such as LinkedIn.

All this sounds quite clever, and on the surface it is, but there are a number of things to consider before you dive in. This applies to both advertisers and site owners allowing for contextual ads (a bit like this blog). We've listed, what we feel, are some key points for advertisers and site owners to be aware of and we hope you find them of interest.

Advertisers:
  1. You will gain coverage in specific areas of the web relevant to the content of your ad.
  2. You'll potentially appear in front a more targeted audience.
  3. Ensure the content of the ad is as specific as possible and not ambiguous. Your quality score due to bounce rate could otherwise suffer.
  4. You're under the complete control of Google. If they think you're relevant they'll place you.
  5. If your competitors have "opted in" to display ads you may very well start appearing on their site.
  6. Being displayed in social networks and social media in an advertising manner may very well work against you if your ad is poorly written. (Better to join in the conversation adding value; rather than gatecrashing and broadcasting yourself.)
  7. Think about related topics where you could help the audience; you may achieve clearer visibility and be seen to be unique and increase the level of attraction.
Website Owners:
  1. You are providing more relevant content (assuming Google do their job properly) for your site visitors.
  2. If you are a business website; blog; your own social network; you are opening a window for your "competitors" to appear on your site.
  3. You may make some money from click-throughs, however, consider the longer term value. Have you just provided you competitor with one of your potential customers?
  4. Think extra specially hard about the content on your site (text, imagery, video etc.) and how it is all labelled and tagged. You may have some obscure references which could attract unwanted types of advertising. This can be interesting if you have a blog accepting uncensored comments, which may contain expletives.
  5. 180 degree/antonym relevancy. A good example of this is a wildlife preservation website who had a feature on alligators and crocodiles to find they had adverts selling shoes and handbags suddenly appear next to the article. This can be avoided.
  6. Think about the potential distraction and degradation of your site visitors' experience. If the risk is too high don't do it.
Of course, the main attraction for having ads on your site is to make some money from click throughs...which is why the web contains a number of "dodgy" affiliates and "misleading" review sites. They write content in such a way to specifically attract certain ads, but that is another story and Google is now much better at spotting these. However, if the monetary gain from having ads on your site is far out weighed by the potential of having a competitor take up valuable real estate on you page and pinching customers, then we'd advise against it.

As an experiment, we vehemently oppose the term "Social Media Marketing". It doesn't make sense and is born out of ignorance. See the "Art of Conversation" presentation for details. But as we have now added the term in this post and tagged it up accordingly, please take a look at the ads on this site...are there any numpties paying to advertise their "Social Media Marketing" skills? Or even worse, are there any that are talking about using social media for lead generation? Don't be misled.